BLIND EQUALITY
INTRODUCTION
Much has been said by the surreptitious Sikh proselytisers about the
status of women in Islaam in comparison to Sikhism. The basic contention
revolves around the premise that 'gender equality' in all affairs of
life is the measure by which fairness and justice is determined for the
treatment of women in a given religion. Hence, the postulate is that
exact fairness and justice can only be reached when this equal
opportunity's policy is implemented in all spheres of life.
We will endeavour to show in this article, insha'Allaah
(God-Willing), that such a proposition is unrealistic, untenable and
impossible to uphold or defend. We shall further demonstrate not only
the absurdity of this fanciful claim and how far removed it is from the
real world, but also how unjust this call for equality is.
"And among humankind is he who disputes about Allaah
without knowledge, without guidance and without a Book of
Enlightenment." (Qur'an 22:8)
BLIND EQUALITY
In Islaam, Allaah from His absolute perfect Wisdom has
defined Gender Roles for men and women that specifically
compliment each sex's distinct mental and physical makeup.
The female constitution possesses unique characteristics and
abilities that are fine-tuned to make her best-suited in
fulfilling a particular role or type of work that the male
would be incapable of achieving, at least to the same degree
of standard, due to the absence of these qualities.
Allaah therefore facilitates the strategic use of distinct
knowledge and skills possessed by women and men to fulfil
complimentary gender roles.
Hence, what is known as Gender Analysis leads to men and
women having different experiences, talents, knowledge and
needs which have been instilled by their Creator.
The Scientific American ran an article in May 2002 entitled:
Sex Differences in the Brain, which suggested:
Men and women differ not only in their physical attributes
and reproductive function but also in many other
characteristics, including the way they solve intellectual
problems. For the past few decades, it has been
ideologically fashionable to insist that these behavioral
differences are minimal and are the consequence of
variations in experience during development before and after
adolescence. Evidence accumulated more recently, however,
suggests that the effects of sex hormones on brain
organization occur so early in life that from the start the
environment is acting on differently wired brains in boys
and girls. Such effects make evaluating the role of
experience, independent of physiological predisposition, a
difficult if not dubious task.
The fact that "the male is not like the female"
(Qur'an 3:36) is a self-evident truth that requires no
further elaboration or proof.
Is there any doubt that the male is different from the
female in many ways? Islaam understands that women are like
men in some aspects, but differ from them in others.
Most of the rulings of Islaam apply to men and women equally.
However, in cases where a distinction is to be made between
the sexes, by necessity of the mental and physical
differences, the Muslim will regard that as a mercy from
Allaah and a sign of knowledge of His creation, whilst the
non-Muslim, due to heedlessness, sees it as oppression,
inequality and injustice; stubbornly insisting that men and
women must be equal.
Unfortunately, many Sikhs, similar to others who have no
guidance from an all-Wise Creator, have fallen into this
mistake, the degree of which varies between the numerous
sects of Sikhism. Some Sikhs have opted to accept this
ideology by jumping on the bandwagon of the liberalists (who
have placed God in the back seat and formulated their own
man-invented standards of freedom, democracy, gender
equality, etc.) and have attempted to justify it by making
recourse to their holy text - Sri Guru Granth Sahib.
Others simply accept the idea upon ignorance without ever
having thought about the dire ramifications.
We refer to this assertion, which rejects the aforementioned
self-evident truth - "the male is not like the female"
(Qur'an 3:36) - replacing it with the call to absolute
equality, as 'Blind Equality'. The protagonists of such a
worldview demand Functional Equality between the two
genders. However the question we ask is:
How feasible is this demand for functional
equality?
There is a reason why the all-Wise created us different. If
He intended both genders to be equal in its functionality,
He would have made us all females or all males. However, the
fact that He created us differently is recognised by Muslims
as part of the universal "balance" (al-Meezaan), part
of which is that each sex compliments the other by
fulfilling a designated role. Furthermore, Allaah has
revealed laws that sustain this different but complimentary
functionality, which maintains this "balance", by not
allowing one to mix with the other.
"And
they (women) have rights (over their husbands) similar (to
those of their husbands) over them." (Qur'an 2:228)
This is from the justice of Allaah.
It should also be pointed out that the word "equality"
is quite often and erroneously attributed to the
Qur'an and to Islaam in recent times. One thing that people misunderstand is that when
they say "Islam is the religion of equality", what they
should be saying in contrast, however, is that Islam is the
"religion of justice". The great scholar Shaykh Ibn 'Uthaymeen elaborated upon the
understanding of justice in this respect as follows:
Here we should note that there are some people who speak of
equality instead of justice, and this is a mistake. We
should not say equality since equality implies no
differentiation between the two. Because of this unjust call
for equality, they started to ask: 'What is the difference
between male and female?' So they made males and females the
same, and then the communists said: 'What difference is
there between ruler and subject? No one has any authority
over anyone else, not even fathers and sons; the father has
no authority over his son,' and so on.
But if we say justice, which means giving each one that to
which he or she is entitled, this misunderstanding no longer
applies, and the word used is correct. Hence, it does not
say in the Qur'an that Allaah enjoins equality; rather it
states:
"Verily,
Allaah enjoins Al‑'Adl (perfect justice)." (Qur'an
16:90)
"And
that when you judge between men, you judge with justice."
(Qur'an 4:58)
Those who say that Islam is the religion of equality are
lying against Islaam. Rather Islaam is the religion of
justice which means treating equally those who are
equal and differentiating between those who are different.
No one who knows the religion of Islaam would say that it is
the religion of equality. Rather what shows you that this
principle is false is the fact that most of what is
mentioned in the Qur'an denies equality, as in the following
verses:
"Say:
Are those who know equal to those who know not?"
(Qur'an 39:9)
"Say:
Is the blind equal to the one who sees? Or darkness equal to
light?" (Qur'an 13:16)
"Not
equal among you are those who spent and fought before the
conquering (of Makkah, with those among you who did so
later)." (Qur'an 57:10)
"Not
equal are those of the believers who sit (at home), except
those who are disabled (by injury or are blind or lame), and
those who strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allaah with
their wealth and their lives." (Qur'an 4:95)
Not one single letter in the Qur'an enjoins equality, rather
it enjoins justice. You will also find that the word justice
is acceptable to people, for I feel that if I am better than
this man in terms of knowledge, or wealth, or piety, or in
doing good, I would not like for him to be equal to me.
Every person knows that he would find it unacceptable if we
say that the male is equal to the female.
Based on
this, Islaam does not regard men and women as equal in
matters where such equality would result in injustice since
an inappropriate recognition of equality would be a severe
form of injustice.
LET JUSTICE PREVAIL
As we stated before:
Most of the rulings of Islaam apply to men and women equally.
However, in cases where a distinction is to be made between
the sexes, by necessity of the mental and physical
differences, the Muslim will regard that as a mercy from
Allaah and a sign of knowledge of His creation, whilst the
non-Muslim, due to heedlessness, sees it as oppression,
inequality and injustice; stubbornly insisting that men and
women must be equal.
The first sentence is extremely important for us to
elaborate upon in order to answer the polemic of some Sikhs
who assert that salvation favours the Muslim male.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Indeed, Allaah has
said in no uncertain terms in a beautiful verse from His
Book:
"Truly, the Muslim men and women; the
believing men and women; the men and the women who are
obedient (to Allaah); the men and women who are truthful (in
their speech and conduct); the men and the women who are
patient (in performing all the duties which Allaah has
ordered and in abstaining from all that Allaah has
forbidden; the men and the women who are humble (before
Allaah); the men and the women who give charity; the men and
the women who observe fasting; the men and the women who
guard their chastity, and the men and the women who
remember Allaah much with their hearts and tongues - Allaah
has prepared for them forgiveness and a great reward
(Paradise)." (Qur'an 33:35)
He also says:
"So, their Lord accepted of them (their
supplication and answered them saying) 'Never will I allow
to be lost the work of any of you, be you male or female.
You are (members) one to another. So those who emigrated and
were driven out from their homes, and suffered harm in My
Cause, and who fought, and were killed (in My Cause), truly,
I will expiate from them their evil deeds and admit them
into Gardens under which rivers flow (in Paradise); a reward
from Allaah, and with Allaah is the best of rewards.'"
(Qur'an 3:195)
"Whoever works righteousness - whether
male or female - while he (or she) is a true believer,
truly, to him We will give a good life (in this world with
respect, contentment and lawful provision), and We shall pay
them certainly a reward in proportion to the best of what
they used to do (Paradise in the Hereafter)."
(Qur'an 16:97)
The above are self-explanatory. From the apparent meaning of
these emphatic verses, it is determinable that any Muslim,
irrespective of gender, will be rewarded. Allaah assures the
believers that He will not "allow
to be lost the work of any of you, be you male or female".
The vast majority of the Holy Islamic Laws (Shari'ah)
are established upon equity and justice. However, a
difference between the two sexes and the respective roles
allocated to each one necessitates a differentiation of
laws.
There are many cases in point that a sincere seeker of truth
would only dispute at his/ her peril. For example,
motherhood which in Islaam is subject to particular laws
that of course are only prescribed upon women. There are
conditions for birth, after-birth, purification rights,
breastfeeding, etc. all of which a Muslim mother must know.
Likewise, the father's role is subject to particular laws
and conditions. For example, he is considered the
breadwinner of the family unit having been given the
important (and often arduous) responsibility of working in
permissible (halaal) ways to maintain the family, as
well as being the head of the household. All these separate
yet complimentary roles carry different rulings that are
mandatory upon the appropriate sex who in turn will be
subject to accountability.
BLIND EQUALITY GONE MAD
"Verily, you follow nothing but conjecture and you do
nothing but lie."
(Qur'an 6:148)
"And most of them follow nothing but conjecture. Certainly,
conjecture can be of no avail against the truth. Surely,
Allaah is All-Knower of what they do."
(Qur'an 10:36)
"They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but
conjecture."
(Qur'an 4:157)
As a result of Sikhs adopting and favouring this unjust
notion of equality, a definite form of perversion has
occurred resulting in a violation of that balanced way in
life which Allaah intended humankind to be upon. Hence, they
have fallen, to their detriment, towards an extreme in their
behaviour and outlook on life.
One such example is the manner in which Sikhs dress. It is
sad to see this perverted acceptance of blind equality taking
such a strong hold among Sikhs that men and women
attempt to dressed in almost identical fashion, which also
includes the dastar
(turban).
"Say
(to them): 'Do you know better or does Allaah?'"
(Qur'an 2:140)
"They
follow nothing but conjecture and what their own souls
desire, even though there has already come to them Guidance
from their Lord." (Qur'an 53:23)
However, Islaam commands women to wear clothes that are
different from those worn by men due to the obvious
difference in the way each sex is tempted by the other. What
is known as Gender Sensitivity is understood and
appreciated by Muslims who are cognisant of the fact that
the appropriate allocation of different roles necessitates
recognition of different needs. Hence, the instructions for
the dress-code of a woman is related to the disposition of
each gender and how they relate to each other. The sexual
temptation posed by each towards the other is markedly
different, and from the wisdom of Allaah, He has prescribed
a distinct and purpose-made dress code that sustains the
balance in life and protects from immorality and extremism.
It would make no sense to tell women to expose those parts
of their body that men are allowed to expose because of the
differences in the temptation posed by one towards the
other.
It is precisely for this reason that Prophet Muhammad (peace
and blessings of Allaah be upon him) strictly cautioned his
followers from making any attempt at imitating the opposite
sex warning them of God's punishment if men began to imitate
women and vice-versa. He said:
'Abdullaah ibn 'Abbaas said: "The Messenger of Allaah
(peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) cursed men
who imitate women and women who imitate men."
(Bukhari 5546)
The great scholar al-Haafidh Ibn Hajar al-Asqalaani (d.852H)
commented:
For men to imitate women and women to imitate men,
deliberately and by choice, is strictly forbidden (haraam)
according to scholarly consensus.
In fact, the strict observance of gender sensitivity and
maintaining the unique outward distinction of both sexes was
so strict that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
upon him) even forbade effeminate men from entering upon
women ordering instead that they be banned from living among
people so as to act as a deterrent while safeguarding against
this unnatural characteristic.
Imam al-Bukhari in his famous collection, Saheeh
al-Bukhari, included this hadeeth in under
the following two chapter headings:
(1) It is forbidden for men who resemble women to enter upon
women.
(2) Expelling men who resemble women from peoples' houses.
However, due to the absence of correct and beneficial
knowledge from the all-Wise, Sikhs are either unaware or
unwilling to accept this reality and thus promulgate, under
the guise of blind equality, the
notion that women imitate men and vice-versa. If only they realised that women
imitating men only leads to womanhood having no true intrinsic value.
"The
male is not like the female" (Qur'an 3:36)
Another example, which is related to the above, is the
conduct of interaction among the Sikhs in their
Gurdwara (we put aside for the moment the manner of
conduct outside their places of worship, such as the
house or at weddings and parties, etc.).
It is generally the case in Gurdwaras that men and
women, though remaining as separate groups, occupy the same open space
as they sit equidistant from Sri Guru
Granth Sahib, which itself is installed on a higher level
as a mark of respect.
This of course is in stark contrast to the traditional
mosque that also houses separate seating areas, but makes
sure a visual division or barrier is setup between the two
sexes. Usually, arrangements are made for separate entrances
for the male and female ensuring that no free-mixing occurs.
The wisdom behind this, as explained above, is the
recognition of sexual temptation posed by each gender
towards the other. Hence, not only is there a prescribed
purpose-made dress code, but an additional safety precaution
is established by cordoning off the two sexes to ensure that
all potential avenues of temptation are cut off; thus,
allowing for complete and undisturbed attention to be paid
towards the purpose of attending the mosque - to worship the
Creator.
However, in their naivety, Sikhs often forward the excuse
that it is impossible for temptation to arise in a place of
worship, or during worship, and in front of the Sri Guru
Granth Sahib. The need of an outward show of equality,
i.e. men and women sitting in the same room equal-distant
from their Holy Book, supersedes the need to protect the
natural temptation that will inevitably arise between men
and women situated in the same locale.
Women usually attend the Gurdwara wearing their most
beautiful garments, bathed in perfume, looking their most
attractive, and often with a flimsy transparent cloth (chuni)
draped over their head, which leaves exposed both the neck
and parts of the chest. It is inconceivable to imagine under
such circumstances that no man would take advantage of the
opportunity of flicking a quick glance over at a woman who
is barely meters away across the room, especially if the
room is full of women.
In matters of worship, how is it possible for men and women
situated in the same room; separated by no barriers, to
sustain their concentration upon worship without any of them
being distracted by the opposite sex?
If this is the case in their places of worship, we can only
imagine the horrifying consequences that result from the
mixing of sexes at home, school, during festive occasions
such as wedding parties and religious congregations and
melas, etc. all under the umbrella of blind equality.
Islaam does not teach nor does it hold to such dangerously
naïve, untenable and impossible scenarios, rather it deals
with reality.
"Should
not He Who created know? And He is the Most Kind and
Courteous (to His slaves), All‑Aware (of everything)."
(Qur'an 67:14)
CONCLUSION
We have seen that this blind call to equality in all spheres
of life is both untenable and impossible due to the clear
and apparent physiological differences of men and women.
Since Allaah has facilitated the strategic use of distinct
knowledge and skills possessed by women and men to fulfil
complimentary gender roles, it would be impossible for one
to assert that both man and woman are equal without ignoring
this a priori difference.
Any wise person, who has sat down and reflected without
jumping on the pseudo-bandwagon of equality, will come to
the inevitable conclusion that the restrictions
and regulations set for two different people of different
backgrounds, cultures and age group must differ. It would be
unreasonable to establish equal rules for a six-year-old
child and a seventeen-year-old since both differ in their
mental and physical maturity.
After recognising, acknowledging and implementing this
amongst ourselves, how is it possible, therefore, for us to
discard this understanding for the One whom we accept as
being the all-Wise and all-Knowledgeable?
How is it possible for someone to affirm that God created
each sex upon a completely different physiology and yet
established laws, regulations, allowances and restrictions
equally for both?
The phrase: "Men are from Mars and women are from Venus"
holds true!
In Islaam, woman has been given a role to fulfil,
determinable from the specifically tailored physical makeup
created by Allaah, which differs from her counterpart.
Hence, we have shown that He, from His perfect Wisdom, has
set laws and conditions for each complimentary role as part
of Islaam's gender sensitivity.
"The
male is not like the female" (Qur'an 3:36)
However, in Islaam these differences are few and far between
since most of the rulings of Islaam apply to men and women
equally.
Hence, it is unfair and ignorant to assert that women in
Islaam have "greater roles to fulfil, but less rights". Such
a proposition is simply untrue.
May Allaah guide us towards the Truth and away from the
whims and desires of man-invented philosophies, which on the
face of it may sound good, but when deconstructed and
examined, fall flat on its face simply because:
"What
is there after Truth, except falsehood?
How then have you turned away?" (Qur'an
10:32)
BACK TO TOP
|