'SUPERSTITIOUS' HADITHS EXPLAINED
|
|
Jaskaran Singh
(username: fact329) contacted Islam-Sikhism on
our
Youtube
Channel with a series of hadiths that he deems to be "superstitious". Yes; another poor attempt
at finding faults with the true religion of God.
Jaskaran Singh's comments -
black
Our Rebuttal - Blue
I will come straight to
point. Please tell the logic behind following superstitions in islam
[sic]:
If a fly falls on your food,
take it and immerse it once more because according to prophet mohammed, the fly
carries the medicine on one wing to counter the disease it carries on the other
wing:
The prophet said "If a house fly falls in the drink of anyone of you, he should
dip it in the drink, for one of its wings has a disease and the other has the
cure for the disease."
(Bukhari V4 B54 N537)
HADITH OF THE FLY
Jaskaran and others like him are winging it (pun
intended) by labelling hadith that do not make sense to their limited
comprehension as superstition.
Evidence has been unearthed by the scientific community that there is more to
the hadith of the fly than meets Jaskaran's myopic eye.
An
experiment coordinated by Dr Saleh as-Saleh and supervised by Dr Jamaal Haamid
of the Dept. of Medical Microbiology College of Science at Qassim University,
Saudi Arabia, revealed that the "complete dipping" of a fly into three separate petri dishes each containing E. Coli bacteria, Coynebacterium Dephtheroid
bacteria and Staphylococcus sp. type bacteria, not only resulted in the "entire
disappearance" of these "pathogenic (disease causing) bacterial colonies", but
more remarkably led to "new bacteria growing ... as Actinomyces ... from which
useful antibiotics can be extracted".
The
process of extracting such antibiotics has also been achieved. ABC Science
published an article in 2002 which stated:
The surface of flies is the last place you would
expect to find antibiotics, yet that is exactly where a team of Australian
researchers is concentrating their efforts.
Ms
Joanne Clarke, who was heading a team of researchers at the Macquarie
University's Dept. of Biological Sciences, was quoted as saying:
Our research is a small part of a global research
effort for new antibiotics, but we are looking where we believe no-one has
looked before. (Ibid)
Although it may be true that no scientist has ever looked into this phenomenon
before, it certainly is not the case that Ms Clarke (now Dr J. Lind), or anyone
else for that matter, was the first to conceive such an idea. In fact, the
question that begs to be asked is whether anyone ever preceded Prophet Muhammad
(upon whom be peace and blessings of Allaah) in suggesting such an approach. If
not, then it could be inferred that the first documented evidence of anyone
proposing the antidotal/ antibacterial properties found on the surface of the
fly was none other than Khatim an-Nabiyeen - The Finality of the (true)
Prophets (of God), Muhammad (upon whom be peace and blessings of Allaah).
There
is yet more. The journal reports a remarkable moment of coincidence during the
course of the experiment when the team unknowingly replicates the Prophet's
(peace and blessings of Allaah) instructions of dipping the fly back into the
fluid to acquire the cure:
The antibiotic material is extracted by drowning
the flies in ethanol, then running the mixture through a filter to obtain
the crude extract.
When this was placed in a solution with various bacteria including E.coli,
Golden Staph, Candida (a yeast) and a common hospital pathogen, antibiotic
action was observed every time. (Ibid; bold, underline ours)
Awareness that flies have the potential for cure, however, was known by the
scientific community as far back as the 1970s. The Economic reported in
1994 that Professor "Juan Alvarez Bravo and his colleagues at the University of
Tokyo hope to see one particular fly, or at least a tiny part of it, in
hospitals everywhere in the not too distant future. They think its unpleasant
habits make it an ideal source of new medicine".
Why?
Because flies "unlike people ... [can] make their own antibiotics". However, such
information "has been known for some time; Shunji Natori, Dr Alvarez Bravo's
boss, identified the ones in S. peregrina 20 years ago". The article concluded:
Far from spreading diseases, as flies usually do,
this particular pest might be used to control them.
As
much as today's scientific studies, which empirically confirm the instructions
delivered by our Prophet over 1400 years ago, make for an interesting read, they
only serve to complement what we as Muslims know and invite others to recognise
and accept: the truth of Muhammad's Prophethood (upon whom be peace and
blessings of Allaah). After all, this is not the first time that science has
unearthed compelling evidence to support the authentic statements of our
Prophet. Muslims do not require 21st century science to provide them
with a rational reason for emulating his example or in fully accepting his
authentic traditions simply because we have always known him to be: as-saadiq
al-masdooq - the truthful one who conveyed the truth re hadith of the
fly.
How
true are the words of Allaah:
"Nor does he (Muhammad) speak from (his own)
caprice. It is no less than revelation revealed."
(Qur'an; 53:3-4)
I heard the Prophet saying,
"Fever is from the heat of the hell fire; so cool it with water."
(Bukhari V4 B54 N484)
FEVER FROM THE HEAT OF
HELL
The
greatest contention of both Islam and Sikhism is belief in a transcendent and
omnipotent deity who is, above all else, unseen. In this respect, both religions
would presumably categorise this and similar such aspects as part of an hitherto
unseen and unobservable realm. In the Islamic world view, there exists an
important methodological distinction between the "observable (i.e. physical)
world" ('aalam ash-shahaadah) and the "unseen or inaccessible (i.e.
metaphysical) world" ('alaam al-ghayb).
Another example of the metaphysical in Sikhism is the belief that Sri Guru
Granth Sahib contains the jott (divine light) of Waheguru. Can
Jaskaran empirically prove or show the existence of this jott? If not,
then is he willing to dismiss this belief as mere superstition or will he appeal
to it being part of the unseen world?
It
should be noted that most of the examples cited by Jaskaran below cannot be
summarily dismissed without him being guilty of employing double-standards.
Hence, in this regard, 'what's good for the goose is indeed good for the
gander'.
There
is, however, another consideration to be aware of when attempting to interpret
scripture correctly, without erroneously reading into it: are hadiths to be
understood literally or figuratively? In the case of the aforecited hadith, the
latter would mean that the causal factor for fever is not hellfire, thus
rendering Jaskaran's objections false.
Bassam Zawadi cites the explainer of Sahih al-Bukhari, Ibn Hajr
al-Asqalani, as stating:
"... from the 'Fai'h' or the 'Fauj' of Hell, which
means, 'from its radiation and heat.' There is a difference of opinion regarding
its relation to Hell. It was said that the relation is literal. Therefore, the
heat felt by one who suffers from a fever is a part of Hell, which Allah made to
appear through means that He has measured so that the slaves heed to this
lesson. Similarly, types of delight and elation are parts of Paradise's delight
and Allah made these to appear in this life as a lesson and a reminder. It was
also said that this Hadeeth (Khabar) is a figure of speech. Thus, in this case,
it would mean that the heat of fever is similar to the heat of Hell to alert
one's inner self to the intensity of the heat of the Fire and that the heat of
fever is similar to the Fire's Fai'h' in that it touches those near it." (Fathul
Baari)
In
light of this, what can be seen is that a genuine difference of opinion exists
in the interpretation of said hadith. All the same, a literal or figurative
understanding is of no significance given Jaskaran's catch-22 situation. If it
is taken literally, then any answers to the question of how a fever could arise
in such a way would necessarily be premised on the Islamic understanding of the
unseen world and the metaphysical laws that govern it. Hence, Jaskaran would be
guilty of employing double-standards if he were to interpret it literally and
accuse Muslims of believing in superstition.
A group of people from 'ukl
tribe came to Medina and they became ill, so the prophet ordered them to go to
the herd of Milch she-camels and told them to go out and drink the camels' urine
and milk as a medicine.
(Bukhari V1 B4 N234)
MEDICINAL PROPERTIES
OF CAMEL URINE
It is
important to identify what the illness was that these people were suffering
from. Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah (d. 751AH/ 1350CE) identifies the ailment as
dropsy:
The proof that these people were complaining from
dropsy, is from Imam Muslim who narrated in his Sahih from the same Hadith above
that the Bedouins said, "We have not found Al-Madinah suitable for us and our
stomachs swelled, our organs became weak..." until the end of the Hadith.
Dropsy is a physical disease that occurs when a
harmful cold substance penetrates the external organs of the body and also the
body organs other than those that are used in digestion, causing them to swell.
Although the hadiths do not specify exactly how the milk and urine were to be
taken, Ibnul Qayyim cites al-Israili as offering a possible prescription that
could have also been used at that time:
Fresh, warm camel's milk is beneficial against
dropsy, especially when taken with fresh, warm camel urine, thus making the
combination more salty and adding strength to its effectiveness in dissolving
harmful fluids and as a laxative. If the [combination of milk and urine] did not
purge the stomach, then one should take a stronger laxative.
The
celebrated polymath Avicenna is also quoted by Ibnul Qayyim as stating:
Do not listen to those who claim that milk does not
provide cure from dropsy. Rather, know that camel's milk is an effective cure,
because it cleanses gently and easily, due to its other qualities. This type of
milk is so beneficial that if a person substituted water and food with camel's
milk, he would be cured [from dropsy and other ailments]. Some people tried this
remedy and were soon cured. We should state that the best camel urine is that of
the camels of Bedouin people.
Aside
from a cure for dropsy, preliminary research conducted by modern medical experts
into the health benefits of camel urine could point towards avenues leading to
some potentially revolutionary breakthroughs and possible advancements in
medical science.
For
example, researchers in Saudi Arabia wrote:
Since antiquity the tribes in the Asian deserts have
used camel urine and milk for several illnesses. These natural products in their
crude form are used in the treatment of stomach infections, tuberculosis and
cancer (Gauthier-Pilters and cell lines (Kudriashov et al., 1979; Peterson
and Peterson, 1979; Adachi et al., 1980; Kanzawa et al., 1982; Kitahara et al.,
1986; Gallant et al., 1993; Lillie et al., 1993; Miller et al., 1993). (bold
ours)
In
regards to cancer, these researchers said:
The mutagenic nature of cytotoxic drugs
is known to cause secondary affliction and is a major drawback for the long term
survivors of chemotherapy (Harris, 1976). However, the complex nature of natural
products has the potential to inhibit the clastogenicity
and suppress secondary malignancies. Uric acid and creatinine present in camel
urine are known to be potent antioxidants (Ames et al., 1981; Glazer, 1988). In
a recent study, AI-Bekairi et al. (1991a, 1991b) reported uric acid to
inhibit the clastogenicity and biochemical changes induced by
cyclophosphamide in mice. (Ibid; bold ours)
Cyclophosphamide (CP) is a drug used to treat various types of cancer and some
autoimmune disorders. It is converted in the liver to active forms that have
chemotherapeutic activity. But, what these researchers wanted to explore was "the effect of camel urine treatment on the cytological and biochemical changes
induced by a known mutagenic and cytotoxic drug, cyclophosphamide (Oleinik,
1985; 1986; AI-Bekairi et al., 1991a)". They believed that "[i]n view of the
cytotoxic, mutagenic, antioxidative and antimutagenic nature of ingredients
present in camel urine and its folklore use in cancer therapy", "[m]ore
scientific studies are required to investigate different aspects of camel urine
due to its different composition as compared with urine of other animals".
Their
results showed that "CP treatment was found to be highly clastogenic, cytotoxic
and it inhibited the levels of proteins, nucleic acids, glutathione and
increased the malondialdehyde concentrations". However:
Unlike treatment with CP, the camel urine treatment
was devoid of any clastogenic activity .... Despite the presence of a number of
mutagenic ingredients such as purine bases, urea derivatives and hypoxanthine
(Peterson and Peterson, 1979; Emerit et al., 1985; Bonatti et al., 1986; Cole et
al., 1991; Moore et al., 1991; Nagao et al., 1991; Matsuda et al., 1991; Liber
and Denault, 1991; Asita et al., 1992; Wood et al., 1992; Basu et al., 1993;
Gruz et al., 1993; Shcherbakova and Pavlov, 1993) the camel urine was not found
to be clastogenic. The non-clastogenic nature observed in the present study
appears to be due to the effect of antioxidative and antimutagenic components of
camel urine such as creatinine and uric acid (Ames et al., 1981; Glazer, 1988;
AI-Bekairi et al., 1991a, 1991b).
The
report concluded:
Our results demonstrate the cytotoxic and
non-mutagenic nature of camel urine and support its folkloric claims.
Further studies are in progress to explore the cytotoxic activity of camel urine
and its active constituents in cancer cells. (bold, underline ours)
As far as additional studies are concerned in further supporting
the "folkloric claims" of camel's urine vis-à-vis cancer cells, then more
recently in 2010, researchers at Saudi Arabia's King Saud University and the
University of Alberta in Canada explored "the ability of three different camel
urines (virgin, lactating, and pregnant source) to modulate a well-known
cancer-activating enzyme
... Cyp1a1". The team were again
motivated by knowledge that "[d]rinking camel urine has been used traditionally
to treat numerous cases of cancer". They revealed:
The camel has played a crucial role in desert dwellers
for thousands of years. Not only the camel has provided transportation and food,
but also its milk and urine have been used traditionally for the maintenance
of good health and in the treatment of diverse diseases (Redwan el
and Tabll, 2007; Conesa et al., 2008; Agrawal et al., 2009). The medicinal use
of camel urine is dated back to the time of the famous Persian scholar known as
Avicenna (980-1037), author of al-Qanoon (The Canon). For the Bedouin people,
camel urine remains an important natural remedy for different diseases.
Until recently, it is traditionally claimed that
drinking camel urine has cured and treated numerous cases of cancer, but this
claim has never been exposed to scientific scrutiny investigation. A very few
studies have been published in the literature regarding the medicinal properties
of camel urine, with just one report describing a possible anti-carcinogenic
activity (al-Harbi et al., 1996). Furthermore, Khorshid and Moshref (2006) have
recently reported the anti-carcinogenic effect of camel urine in different
cancer types in rats. However, these studies did not investigate the mechanisms
by which camel urines exhibit anti-carcinogenic effect. (Ibid; bold, underline ours)
The
results found that while "virgin camel urine showed the highest degree of
inhibition at the activity level":
All types of camel, but not bovine, urines
differentially inhibited the induction of Cyp1a1 gene expression by TCDD, the
most potent Cyp1a1 inducer and known carcinogenic chemical.
In conclusion, the present work provides the first
evidence that camel urine inhibits the TCDD-mediated effect, at least in part by
inhibiting the expression of Cyp1a1, a cancer-activating gene, at both the
transcriptional and the post-transcriptional levels through an AhR-dependent
mechanism. These results are of potential clinical significance to humans
in that it uncovers the molecular mechanism involved and could explain the
anecdotal evidence for the successful use of camel urine in the treatment of
various medical conditions. (bold, underline ours)
Also
in 2010, the African Journal of Agricultural Research published a
research paper titled: The Inhibitory Effect of Camel's Urine on Mycotoxins and
Fungal Growth. The paper acknowledges that "camel's milk and urine have medical
effects, so Islam encourages and permits the drinking of camel milk, and camel
urine is permitted in case of necessary medical treatment (Al-Bukhhari)"
(bold ours). It goes on to reveal:
There are many well known health benefits,
with regard to drinking the milk and urine of camels, to the earlier generations
of medical science and they have been proven by modern scientific researches.
For example swollen abdomen, which may indicate oedema and liver disease
(jaundice), or cancer, and thin bodies which indicate extreme weakness, and
which often accompanies hepatitis or cancer. This may be due to the
effectiveness of camel's urine, as against all other cattle to the active
substances contained in desert plants which benefited more of them; this was
summed up by the Prophet (peace be upon him). Many researches have been
conducted on a variety of desert plants and a strong effect against bacteria,
yeast and fungi has been found. Kaul et al. (1976) and Zaki et al. (1984) have
conducted researches on the wormwood plant, and results have shown strong
effectiveness against bacteria, yeast and fungi. (bold ours)
The
paper then cites a number of studies conducted over the past three decades
showing the varied health benefits of camel urine and milk.
Hence, rather than this hadith being full of superstition as Jaskaran
mistakenly asserts, the true import and wisdom of
Prophet Muhammad's (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) recommendation
has only today come to be more deeply appreciated after scientific research
unearthed the potentially unique medicinal properties of camel's urine.
The prophet said, "If anyone of
you rouses from sleep and performs the ablution, he should wash his nose by
putting water in it and then blowing it out thrice, because satan has stayed in
the upper part of his nose all the night."
(Bukhari V4 B54 N516)
SATAN SLEEPS IN
THE NOSE
Again Satan is a living creature that exists as part of
the unseen world.
It was mentioned before the
prophet that there was a man who slept the night till morning after sunrise. The
prophet said, "He is a man in whose ears satan had urinated."
(Bukhari V4 B54 N492)
SATAN URINATES IN
THE EARS
Ibid.
Mohammad said he split the moon in two. To this day, muslims believe the moon
was split, and that that is legitimate proof of mohammad's miracle [sic]:
During the lifetime of the prophet the moon was split into two parts and on that
the prophet said, "Bear witness to thus." That the meccan people requested
allah's apostle to show them a miracle, and so he showed them the splitting of
the moon. The moon was split into two parts during the lifetime of the prophet.
[sic]
(Bukhari V4 B56 N830-832)
THE SPLITTING OF THE MOON MIRACLE
If miracles are a phenomenon which Jaskaran
rejects entirely as
superstition, then he must be consistent and also reject stories of miracles
allegedly performed by his Gurus. Besides, are miracles beyond the ability of
the Almighty? The answer is no.
The prophet said, "Allah does
not accept prayer of anyone of you if he does hadath (passes wind) till he
performs the ablution (anew)."
(Bukhari V9 B86 N86)
PASSING WIND
BREAKS ABLUTION
There does not seem to be anything superstitious about
the strict conditions of purity and cleanliness that are conditional for prayer
to be valid and acceptable to God. Breaking wind that leads to ablution being
rendered void is simply a peculiarity that is specific to the ritual
performances of Muslims in preparation for their worship of God as instructed by
none other than Him.
Jaskaran and his fellow Sikhs have much more serious things to contend with
including
idol-worship of their "divine" scripture, SGGS.
Jabir b. 'Abdullah reported
Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) having said: Do not eat with your left
hand, for the Satan eats with his left hand.
(Sahih Muslim B023 N5007)
PROHIBITION OF
EATING WITH THE LEFT HAND
Belief in God, Satan, angels, jinn, paradise, hell-fire, the punishment of the
grave, etc. are all parts of the unseen world. Information of the peculiar
characteristics of the species known as jinn, of which Satan is a member, only
reaches us through revelation. It has been disclosed to Muslims of not only how
Satan accomplishes his modus operandi of misguiding humankind from fulfilling
their true purpose in life, but also some characteristics specific to him. We
know that Satan can take the shape of human beings and some animals. He can also
travel great distances without the aid of technology in very short periods of
time. Being the obstinate and arrogant creature that he is, which was
essentially the reason for his original expulsion from paradise following his
first act of disobedience to God, Satan has wilfully chosen to adopt a behaviour
in opposition to God's commandments. So, for example, Allaah has instructed
Muslims to carry out all acts considered impure, such as cleaning the private
parts after relieving oneself, with the left hand; leaving the right hand to do
all things designated as pure, such as eating. As an avowed enemy of God and
humankind, however, Satan does the opposite; thus, he eats with his left hand.
Hence, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) is reminding
Muslims to do all things pure with the right hand and that eating with one's
left hand is in imitation of one who is the greatest personification of evil.
It is
no more superstitious to believe in Satan as an unseen entity, protect ourselves
from his evil plots and refrain from imitating his evil ways as it is to believe
in God as another unseen entity and striving to listen and obey Him.
There
is also a matter of how far Jaskaran and those like him will go in applying this
arbitrary label. Will he apply it to anything related to Satan and his antics?
How about anything to do with angels? A point that Jaskaran et al. would do well
to consider is that it is not illogical for God to create other species that
are, in general, hidden and unseen. This is entirely within His capability.
Abu Huraira reported: The
Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: A woman, an ass and a dog
disrupt the prayer, but something like the back of a saddle guards against that.
(Sahih Muslim B004 N1034)
WOMEN, DOGS AND DONKEYS 'CUT-OFF' PRAYER
Why is it that Jaskaran sees certain aspects of Islamic
orthopraxy as superstitious, but would not dare to label the worship rituals of
Sikhism, such as the Sukhasan ceremony, which we use to support
our assertion that Sikhs worship their so-called divine scripture as an idol, in
the same way? On what objective basis does Jaskaran consider one to be
superstition and not the other: perhaps a religiously motivated subjective bias?
As
for the correct understanding of the aforecited hadith, then it is either
strongly recommended or obligated - depending on what opinion one follows - for
either the imam, who leads a congregation in prayer, or the lone worshipper to
erect a barrier (Arabic: sutrah) in front to ensure that nothing passes
between said individuals and their sutrah.
In a
hadith narrated by Abu Sa'eed al-Khudri, the Prophet (peace and blessings of
Allaah be upon him) said:
If any one of you is praying, he should not let
anyone pass in front of him. Let him push that person away as much as he can;
but if that person insists then fight him, for he is nothing more than devilish
(in nature).
As to
the cutting off (Arabic: yaqtha'u) of prayer with the passing of a woman,
donkey or dog, then again there exists a difference of opinion among the
scholars as to whether this annuls the prayer or merely adversely affects its
merit.
For
example, Imam Nawawi states:
Imam Malik, Abu Hanifah and
ash-Shafi'ee (may Allaah be pleased with them) and the majority of the scholars
from the Salaf [first three generation of Muslims] and Khalaf
[successors to the first three generation of Muslims] said: The prayer is not
annulled by the passing of any of them (i.e. dog, donkey and woman) and other
than them. These scholars have interpreted the hadith to mean that what is meant
by "cut off" is that there is a decrease in the merit of the prayer due to the
heart being distracted by these things and does not mean that the prayers
are invalidated.
(bold ours)
However, others such as Imam Ahmed ibn Hanbal, Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibnul Qayyim,
et alia, held the opposite opinion.
Be
that as it may, the point is that again this hadith does not constitute a
superstitious belief.
Abu Huraira reported
Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying. When you listen to the
crowing of the cock, ask Allah for His favour as it sees Angels and when you
listen to the braying of the donkey, seek refuge in Allah from the Satan for it
sees Satan.
(Sahih Muslim B035 N6581)
COCKS SEE ANGELS;
DONKEYS SEE SATAN
Once again, these are portents of the unseen world.
Anas reported Allah's Apostle
(may peace be upon him) disapproved the drinking of water while standing.
(Sahih Muslim B023 N5017)
PROHIBITION OF
DRINKING WATER STANDING
This instruction is merely from the etiquettes of
drinking and not based on superstition. The question that should be asked is
whether it is strictly prohibited for a Muslim to drink while standing?
And the answer is no given the existence of hadith that
mention the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) drinking while
standing. This point was answered by Shaykh Bin Baaz as follows:
Q: Some purified hadiths forbid eating and drinking
while standing while some other Hadiths allow doing so; which hadiths must we
follow?
A: Both the two groups of hadith referred to in the
question are sahih (authentic). To be clearer, it is reported that the
Prophet (peace be upon him) forbade people to eat or drink while standing and
that he (peace be upon him) drank while standing. This issue is flexible, for
all the narrations mentioned above are sahih; all praise be to Allah Alone.
Forbiddance here is to express a karahiyyah (reprehensibility). However,
one needs to eat or drink while standing; it is permissible because it is
authentically reported that the Prophet (peace be upon him) drank while sitting
and while standing. In addition, it is authentically reported that the Prophet
(peace be upon him): "Drank from Zamzam (a well near the Ka'bah) while
standing." Also, there is another sahih hadith that is narrated on the
authority of 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) to the effect that the Prophet
(peace be upon him) drank while standing and while sitting. Again, the issue is
flexible. In conclusion, drinking and eating while sitting is better and
healthier though it is permissible for a person to drink and eat while standing.
A solar eclipse once occured
[sic] at the prophet's time. The sahabah left their jobs. Even young boys who
were practising archery hastened towards the mosque to see what the prophet
would do at that time. The prophet started two rak'ats of salaah, which were so
long that some people fainted and fell down. He wept in his salaah and said, "O,
my lord! Thou hast said that thou wouldst not punish them as long as I am
amongst them and so long as they seek forgiveness". He then addressed the people
saying, "You should hasten for salaah whenever you happen to find the sun or
moon in eclipse. If you happen to know the signs of the last day as I do then
surely you would weep more and laugh less. In all such happenings, make haste
towards salaah."
SOLAR ECLIPSE - A
CURSE FROM GOD?
It is
clear from the hadith that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon
him) did not pray or weep on account of any superstitious beliefs over the
event, but rather what the eclipse represented: a reminder to him of the "signs
of the last day" as clearly alluded to in the hadith.
Other
than a few descriptive signs regarding the immanency of the last day being
disclosed to him, which would include chapter 75 of the Qur'an speaking of the
moon being eclipsed, as well as the fact that it was "close at hand",
Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) was well aware that he
would not be privy to the exact time of the final hour. It is entirely
plausible, therefore, that the sheer grandeur of such a rare and spectacular
natural occurrence as an eclipse could have caused him to think that the day of
judgement was closer than he might have imagined.
Abu
Musa al-Ash'ari reported that the Prophet said:
These signs [eclipses] that Allaah sends are not for
the death or life of anyone, but Allaah makes His slaves afraid through them, so
if you see anything of that [eclipses], then hasten to remember Allaah and call
on Him and seek His forgiveness.
Coupled with starkly vivid details revealed by Allaah in the Qur'an describing
the horrifying events of the destruction of the earth and the entire universe,
which will include the eclipsing of the moon, such as the following:
He questions: "When is the Day of Resurrection?"
At length, when the sight is dazed.
And the moon is eclipsed.
And the sun and moon are united.
That Day will Man say "Where is the refuge?"
By no means! No place of safety!
Before thy Lord (alone), that Day will be the place of rest.
That Day will man be told (all) that he put forward, and all that he put back.
Nay, man will be evidence against himself.
Though he forwards his excuses. (Qur'an 75:6-15)
It
is, again, highly plausible, given how God-conscious Muhammad (peace and
blessings of Allaah be upon him) was of his Lord, that this all culminated in
triggering within him not only a natural fear of facing such a harrowing
occurrence, but also concern for his followers. After all, since the Prophet's
past, present and future sins had been forgiven by God, thus, guaranteeing him a
place in paradise, the same was not true for all his followers.
The
commencement of the final day at that time could also represent a final
punishment for his people for any wrongs they had committed. Hence, the reason
why he emphasises the condition of seeking forgiveness as means of staving off
God's punishment.
It
would also mean an end to their opportunity in seeking His forgiveness. It is
this selfless concern he had for his people, and mankind in general, that
prompted him to drop everything and rush to prayer in a bid to earnestly beseech
his Lord to delay the final day and provide them with respite. In effect, he
lays down a precedence for his followers to emulate during such events.
There
is no proof that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) prayed
during the eclipse out of superstition. Rather there is evidence to show that
he, in fact, did everything to break any superstitious beliefs held by his
people.
For
example, there existed the superstitious belief among the pre-Islamic pagan
Arabs that eclipses marked the birth or death of a great person. However, the
Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) declared this
belief to be false and explained the divine wisdom behind the occurrence of
eclipses. Ibn Mas'ud al-Ansaari said:
The sun was eclipsed the day Ibraheem, the Messenger
of Allaah's son, died resulting in the people claiming: "The sun is eclipsed
because of the death of Ibraheem." The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings
of Allaah be upon him) said: "The sun and the moon are two signs from Allaah,
and they do not become eclipsed over the death or the birth of anyone. If you
see it, then hasten to remember Allaah through prayer.
In
another version narrated by his wife 'A'ishah, he added:
If you see it, then call on Allaah, perform prayer,
give charity....
This again
emphasises the seeking of God's forgiveness and His remembrance through prayer,
followed by further good deeds in the form of alms-giving.
FOR most people, flies are the epitome of
unhygienic squalor, the last thing one would want in a hospital. Yet
Juan Alvarez Bravo and his colleagues at the University of Tokyo hope to
see one particular fly, or at least a tiny part of it, in hospitals
everywhere in the not too distant future. They think its unpleasant
habits make it an ideal source of new medicine. For, as the early
investigators of penicillin mould discovered, creatures that live
cheek-by-jowl with germs have clever chemical tricks for dealing with
them.
Sarcophaga peregrina, the fly in question,
is one of summer's less welcome visitors. The adults are large and
annoying and the larvae feed on rotting meat. They are not alone in this
taste; meat rots because zillions of bacteria are munching their way
through it. Such bacteria would not be averse to a little fly larva in
their diet too. To survive their predations, larvae must be tough. They
are. A fly larva (weighing about a hundred-thousandth as much as a
person) can survive injections of bacteria in quantities that would give
a human a very gippy stomach.
Flies can stand such abuse because, unlike
people, they make their own antibiotics. This has been known for some
time; Shunji Natori, Dr Alvarez Bravo's boss, identified the ones in S.
peregrina 20 years ago. Until recently, their presence remained merely a
curiosity. But strains of bacteria now exist that eat conventional
antibiotics for breakfast and so are almost impossible to control. Any
extension of the antibiotic arsenal is welcome. Dr Alvarez Bravo thinks
that S. peregrina may have just the thing.
The larvae make around half a dozen
antibiotics. Dr Alvarez Bravo decided to concentrate on one: sapecin-B.
This is a small protein, consisting of a mere 34 of the amino-acid units
of which all proteins are composed. That is not small enough, however,
to be overlooked by the human immune system. The body's ever-vigilant
defences react badly to foreign proteins in the bloodstream. To use one
as an antibiotic risks provoking an allergic reaction.
The immune system is, however, usually
willing to ignore interlopers less than about ten amino acids long, so
Dr Alvarez Bravo wondered whether he could isolate the business part of
sapecin-B from the wrapping. He worked out the molecule's shape using a
nuclear-magnetic resonance machine (a distant cousin of a hospital
body-scanner), and realised that it was composed of four distinct
pieces. He then synthesised each of the pieces from its appropriate
amino acids and tested them on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus
aureus (MRSA), a strain of bacterium whose resistance has long been the
bane of hospital surgical wards.
Dr Alvarez Bravo found that one of the
pieces, a spiral 11 amino acids long, was almost as good at killing MRSA
as the whole molecule. And 11 amino acids long is small enough, just, to
avoid the immune system.
But there was another problem. An ideal
antibiotic is one you can swallow. The trouble with proteins is that
they tend to be digested in the stomach, breaking them up. Dr Alvarez
Bravo was equal to this. Amino acid molecules come in two forms, known
as L and D. Although they are mirror images of one another, only the L
form normally exists in living things. So he tried making the spiral out
of D-amino acids in the hope that it would then prove indigestible. It
did and, as a bonus, was also more effective at killing MRSA in
test-tubes than the L form.
It could also save lives-albeit, at first,
only the lives of rodents. Dr Alvarez Bravo took some mice and
suppressed their immune systems with cyclophosphamide, a drug. Then he
infected the animals with MRSA. Of those subsequently injected with the
cut-down, inverted version of sapecin-B, 80% survived for more than a
week. The unfortunate mice that were given only saline injections
succumbed within two days.
Laboratory trials do not a medicine make.
Next must come a serious check to ensure that sapecin-B is not poisonous
to people. The auspices are good. Unlike commercial antibiotics (which
generally work by blocking a biochemical pathway), sapecin-B seems to do
something nasty to the membrane that keeps a bacterium's insides in. The
germs may simply "bleed" to death. Mammalian membranes are different.
Experiments on cells from cattle have shown that sapecin-B does not have
the same effect on bovine cell membranes. It is probably safe for fellow
mammals such as humans.
Ahead after that is the long slog of
clinical trials and maybe, in a decade or so, a prescribable drug. Far
from spreading diseases, as flies usually do, this particular pest might
be used to control them.
BACK TO TOP
|